Which countries do not have an army 2024?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more

Elijah Price
Works at PayPal, Lives in San Jose, CA
As a subject matter expert in international relations and security studies, I am well-versed in the unique circumstances of countries that have chosen not to maintain a standing army. The decision to forgo a military is often influenced by historical, cultural, and geopolitical factors. Let's delve into some of these nations and understand the rationale behind their choice.
Costa Rica is a notable example of a country that abolished its military. In 1948, following a civil war, the government decided to disband its armed forces and instead invest in education, healthcare, and environmental protection. This decision was enshrined in the country's constitution, making Costa Rica one of the few nations without a military. The country's emphasis on peace and education has led to a high standard of living and a stable democracy.
Grenada, another country without a standing army, has a history of military intervention and has chosen a different path for its security. Grenada relies on a small paramilitary force for internal security and cooperates with regional security organizations for external defense.
Kiribati, an island nation in the Pacific, does not have a traditional army. Its security is primarily focused on maritime and coastal defense, with assistance from neighboring countries and international organizations.
Andorra, nestled in the Pyrenees between France and Spain, has not had a standing army since the 13th century. It has a unique arrangement with its two larger neighbors, relying on their military support for defense needs.
Vatican City, the smallest independent state in the world, also does not have an army. Its security is maintained by the Swiss Guard, a small force that is more ceremonial in nature and serves to protect the Pope and the Holy See.
Iceland is another interesting case. It does not have a traditional military but has a coast guard that is responsible for search and rescue, fisheries protection, and maritime security. Iceland relies on its NATO membership for collective defense.
These countries have chosen to prioritize other aspects of governance and societal well-being over the traditional military establishment. Their decisions reflect a commitment to peaceful coexistence and international cooperation, and they often rely on alliances and partnerships for their security.
Costa Rica is a notable example of a country that abolished its military. In 1948, following a civil war, the government decided to disband its armed forces and instead invest in education, healthcare, and environmental protection. This decision was enshrined in the country's constitution, making Costa Rica one of the few nations without a military. The country's emphasis on peace and education has led to a high standard of living and a stable democracy.
Grenada, another country without a standing army, has a history of military intervention and has chosen a different path for its security. Grenada relies on a small paramilitary force for internal security and cooperates with regional security organizations for external defense.
Kiribati, an island nation in the Pacific, does not have a traditional army. Its security is primarily focused on maritime and coastal defense, with assistance from neighboring countries and international organizations.
Andorra, nestled in the Pyrenees between France and Spain, has not had a standing army since the 13th century. It has a unique arrangement with its two larger neighbors, relying on their military support for defense needs.
Vatican City, the smallest independent state in the world, also does not have an army. Its security is maintained by the Swiss Guard, a small force that is more ceremonial in nature and serves to protect the Pope and the Holy See.
Iceland is another interesting case. It does not have a traditional military but has a coast guard that is responsible for search and rescue, fisheries protection, and maritime security. Iceland relies on its NATO membership for collective defense.
These countries have chosen to prioritize other aspects of governance and societal well-being over the traditional military establishment. Their decisions reflect a commitment to peaceful coexistence and international cooperation, and they often rely on alliances and partnerships for their security.
2024-06-22 02:45:59
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Works at the International Air Transport Association, Lives in Montreal, Canada.
Today, there are 23 countries that have no active military force, including Costa Rica, Iceland, Panama, Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and The Vatican. These nations vary in size, history, and reasons behind choosing to not have a standing army.
2023-04-24 20:54:03

Scarlett Gonzales
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Today, there are 23 countries that have no active military force, including Costa Rica, Iceland, Panama, Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and The Vatican. These nations vary in size, history, and reasons behind choosing to not have a standing army.