What is flux and what is redux 2024?
I'll answer
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.20
Earn 20 gold coins for an accepted answer.
40more
40more
Luke Reed
Works at Dropbox, Lives in San Francisco, CA
Hello, I'm a software engineer with extensive experience in building web applications. I've worked with a variety of frameworks and libraries, and I'm passionate about building clean, maintainable code. Today, I'm happy to discuss Flux and Redux, two popular architectural patterns used for managing application state in JavaScript applications.
Let's start with Flux, a unidirectional data flow architecture. Imagine your application as a series of interconnected components. Each component has its own state and actions. Actions are triggered by user events or asynchronous operations. They don't modify the state directly; instead, they emit dispatches which are then processed by a central dispatcher. The dispatcher then sends the dispatch to stores, which are responsible for managing the application's state. When a store's state changes, it emits a change event. Components listening to these change events will update themselves accordingly.
Here's a breakdown of the key components in Flux:
* Actions: These are plain JavaScript objects that describe an event or a change in the application. They are sent to the dispatcher.
* Dispatcher: A central hub that receives actions and broadcasts them to the stores.
* Stores: These are responsible for managing the application's state. They respond to actions and emit change events when their state is updated.
* View: This is the user interface of your application. It listens to change events from the stores and updates itself accordingly.
Flux promotes a clear and predictable flow of data. This makes it easier to understand how the application works, debug issues, and make changes. However, as your application grows, managing multiple stores and their interactions can become complex.
Redux takes the core principles of Flux and simplifies them into a single, centralized store. Instead of managing multiple stores, Redux uses a single store for the entire application. This makes it easier to manage the state and understand how it flows through the application.
Redux consists of three core concepts:
* Store: A single, centralized store that holds the entire application state.
* Actions: Plain JavaScript objects that describe an event or a change in the application. Actions are dispatched to the reducer.
* Reducers: Pure functions that take the current state and an action as input and return a new state based on the action.
Redux emphasizes immutability, meaning that the state is never directly modified. Instead, the reducer returns a new, updated state based on the current state and the action.
Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how Redux works:
1. Dispatching an Action: When a user interacts with the application, an action is dispatched. The action is a plain JavaScript object containing information about the event.
2. Reducer Function: The action is passed to the reducer function. The reducer is a pure function that takes the current state and the action as input and returns a new state.
3. Updating the Store: The updated state is then sent to the store. The store is the single source of truth for the entire application.
4. Rendering Components: Components subscribe to changes in the store. When the state changes, the components re-render themselves with the new data.
Redux provides a powerful framework for managing state, but it can add some complexity to your application. The tradeoff is that it offers a clear and predictable way to manage your state, making your code more organized, testable, and easier to understand.
In Summary:
* Flux offers a flexible architecture for managing state by using a central dispatcher and multiple stores.
* Redux simplifies Flux by using a single store and a centralized reducer, leading to a more predictable and organized state management approach.
Choosing between Flux and Redux depends on your specific project needs and preferences. If you need a flexible and highly customizable architecture, Flux might be a better choice. If you value simplicity and a more streamlined approach, Redux might be the better option.
Remember, both Flux and Redux are just tools to help you manage your application's state. Ultimately, the best approach is the one that makes your code easier to understand, maintain, and debug.
Let's start with Flux, a unidirectional data flow architecture. Imagine your application as a series of interconnected components. Each component has its own state and actions. Actions are triggered by user events or asynchronous operations. They don't modify the state directly; instead, they emit dispatches which are then processed by a central dispatcher. The dispatcher then sends the dispatch to stores, which are responsible for managing the application's state. When a store's state changes, it emits a change event. Components listening to these change events will update themselves accordingly.
Here's a breakdown of the key components in Flux:
* Actions: These are plain JavaScript objects that describe an event or a change in the application. They are sent to the dispatcher.
* Dispatcher: A central hub that receives actions and broadcasts them to the stores.
* Stores: These are responsible for managing the application's state. They respond to actions and emit change events when their state is updated.
* View: This is the user interface of your application. It listens to change events from the stores and updates itself accordingly.
Flux promotes a clear and predictable flow of data. This makes it easier to understand how the application works, debug issues, and make changes. However, as your application grows, managing multiple stores and their interactions can become complex.
Redux takes the core principles of Flux and simplifies them into a single, centralized store. Instead of managing multiple stores, Redux uses a single store for the entire application. This makes it easier to manage the state and understand how it flows through the application.
Redux consists of three core concepts:
* Store: A single, centralized store that holds the entire application state.
* Actions: Plain JavaScript objects that describe an event or a change in the application. Actions are dispatched to the reducer.
* Reducers: Pure functions that take the current state and an action as input and return a new state based on the action.
Redux emphasizes immutability, meaning that the state is never directly modified. Instead, the reducer returns a new, updated state based on the current state and the action.
Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how Redux works:
1. Dispatching an Action: When a user interacts with the application, an action is dispatched. The action is a plain JavaScript object containing information about the event.
2. Reducer Function: The action is passed to the reducer function. The reducer is a pure function that takes the current state and the action as input and returns a new state.
3. Updating the Store: The updated state is then sent to the store. The store is the single source of truth for the entire application.
4. Rendering Components: Components subscribe to changes in the store. When the state changes, the components re-render themselves with the new data.
Redux provides a powerful framework for managing state, but it can add some complexity to your application. The tradeoff is that it offers a clear and predictable way to manage your state, making your code more organized, testable, and easier to understand.
In Summary:
* Flux offers a flexible architecture for managing state by using a central dispatcher and multiple stores.
* Redux simplifies Flux by using a single store and a centralized reducer, leading to a more predictable and organized state management approach.
Choosing between Flux and Redux depends on your specific project needs and preferences. If you need a flexible and highly customizable architecture, Flux might be a better choice. If you value simplicity and a more streamlined approach, Redux might be the better option.
Remember, both Flux and Redux are just tools to help you manage your application's state. Ultimately, the best approach is the one that makes your code easier to understand, maintain, and debug.
2024-06-21 09:54:54
reply(1)
Helpful(1122)
Helpful
Helpful(2)
Studied at University of California, Berkeley, Lives in Berkeley, CA
Flux is a pattern and Redux is a library. ... Both Flux and Redux have actions. Actions can be compared to events (or what trigger events). In Flux, an action is a simple JavaScript object, and that's the default case in Redux too, but when using Redux middleware, actions can also be functions and promises.
2023-04-24 05:22:51
Gabriel Martin
QuesHub.com delivers expert answers and knowledge to you.
Flux is a pattern and Redux is a library. ... Both Flux and Redux have actions. Actions can be compared to events (or what trigger events). In Flux, an action is a simple JavaScript object, and that's the default case in Redux too, but when using Redux middleware, actions can also be functions and promises.
